Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Decending to circuit altitude and not 0ft


Author
Message
Sky Painter
Sky Painter
Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 626, Visits: 15K
Lol! You are quite right of course. The correct answer should be to commence your decent 12 mile out. I divided when I should have multiplied! It just goes to show – never do anything in a hurry and check your figures!

Mike
_________________________________________
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.1.1.0
Huawei P30 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.1.1.0
PC – Windows 10 (Home Ed) Version 2009, Build 19045.
6093, SD 4.0.2.0

Bealeyman
Bealeyman
Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)Too Much Forum (733 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40, Visits: 91
Just catching up on the the forum and note Sky Painter's remarks on calculating the descent. In the scenario above the calculation made is that 5 miles out will do it but if one is travelling at 1.5 miles per minute as described that means a time of 3.3 minutes is all one would have to lose 4000 feet and therefore 500 ft/min would never work. Perhaps a SkyDemon feature might be helpful after all as obviously even in an armchair this is proving a challenge though I agree it is not rocket science.
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.4K
We could do that, but generally we do not implement features until we judge we can implement them perfectly. We do plan to include more circuit information in future, and your suggested feature would be a natural extension of that work.
Ton
Ton
Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9, Visits: 57
Tim, You make it more complex than the solution I had in mind :-). I thought about a standard setting “prefer joining altitude above destination airport”  (+500ft, +600ft, +700ft etc.). Ton

Sky Painter
Sky Painter
Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 626, Visits: 15K
C'mon guys! We're VFR pilots and SD is an aid to VFR flight, NOT a Flight Management System (FMS).

We all learnt to fly by reference to a line drawn on a chart, a stopwatch attached to our clipboard, and some fairly rudimentary calculations, using either a 'wizz wheel' or the 'max drift' method and forecast winds aloft to establish an approximate magnetic heading to steer and ground speed (GS).

So, in this scenario, you're approaching your destination at 5,000 feet, so you have 4,000 feet to lose to get down to circuit height which, at a descent rate of 500fpm is 8 minutes. Your aircraft cruises at 100kts, but you have a headwind component of 10kts, so your GS is 90kts (1.5 miles per minute). 8 divided by 1.5 (or 16 divided by 3 makes the mental arithmetic a little easier) indicates that you need to commence your descent at a little over 5 miles out. It's not rocket science!

I don't mean to sound patronising, and if I have upset anyone, then here and now I apologise unreservedly, but as VFR pilots, by relying too much on GPS, we are in danger of neglecting our responsibilities as airspace users and losing those precious skills learnt early on in our flying. Don't misunderstand me, I think GPS is a modern day miracle and an absolute godsend, especially if the weather turns against you. However, if we neglect those basic skills by which we all learnt to fly, we do so out our peril, because the day will surely come when we need to fall back on those skills to get us out of trouble.

Even as an avid SD user, my primary means of navigation is still a stopwatch and a chart, on which I have a course line drawn, annotated with magnetic heading, distance and an approximate a wind arrow. I also use all available radio navaids if appropriate. SD is my backup, especially if the weather turns bad, but if SD should fail (it never has, but could so easily do so through no fault if its own), I know where I am, how far and how long to my destination.

SD is a tool, and a very good one at that, NOT a replacement for basic flying/navigation skills. End of rant!

Mike
_________________________________________
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.1.1.0
Huawei P30 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.1.1.0
PC – Windows 10 (Home Ed) Version 2009, Build 19045.
6093, SD 4.0.2.0

Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.4K
We may implement this at a point in the future where you are nominating the runway, circuit and join you are performing. At the moment since SkyDemon does not know whether you're going for long finals, and it doesn't even know the circuit height either in most cases, it doesn't make sense for us to make this alteration yet.
DirDej
DirDej
Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)Too Much Forum (14K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 120, Visits: 1.5K
I agree, a descent to 1000ft circuit height is more realistic. You may or may not get s straight-in. There are many places where you would get hurt if you blindly follow the descent to 0ft.
efrenken
efrenken
Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 265, Visits: 3.5K
Good idea, but what if you plan a straight in?

Eric
Ton
Ton
Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.4K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9, Visits: 57
Currently SD sugest to start decending from my flying altitude towards the aerdrome at 0ft sugesting I make a straight inn. Might it be possible to change that to circuit altitude? That more realistic as I have to fly the circuit before landing.
Thanks Ton
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search